Archive for June 22nd, 2009

In USA’s redemption song, Bob Bradley can sing the loudest

Finally a tale of good fortune for a United States team that so often returns home bemoaning its bad luck.

Somehow on Sunday night, a cluster of stars all aligned for Bob Bradley’s team, as every improbable permutation needed for it to remain in the Confederations Cup slotted neatly into place during a 3-0 win over Egypt.

On countless occasions, the postscript for the USA has been a sob story. The under-23 squad felt it at the Beijing Olympics, when its inability to hold on for a few extra seconds against Holland cost it a trip to the knockout stage. World Cup campaigns also have been littered with misfortune, excuses and mishaps that prevented the U.S. from deeper progress.

Bradley could not have wished for a better time for fate to smile upon him. Bracing for a barrage of doubt and conjecture surrounding his future when he returned home, the head coach now can view this tuneup for South Africa 2010 as something of a success.

No one is pretending that the Confederations Cup is an event which resonates strongly through the soccer world. But it is far better to still be around and get a crack at a semifinal than an early exit, which looked all-but-guaranteed for the Americans heading into the weekend.

One win doesn’t erase the memories of a series of sub-par performances that began in the last round of World Cup qualifiers. However, one of the biggest criticisms of Bradley was that he seemed unable to lift his players when the occasion demanded it.

Well, he sure did this time.

Gone were the nervousness and inferiority complex of the matches against Brazil and Italy. Suddenly, the USA had gained some courage, organization and spirit.

Now we will see once and for all if the Americans’ panic only sets in against high-profile teams because no side in the world is better than Spain right now. With another stuttering, timid performance against the European champions on Wednesday, the U.S. will be back to square one.

But somewhere in the Egypt game lay some genuine reason for hope. There was a sense that this U.S. team might just possess a bit of gumption, which is one of the most vital commodities come World Cup time. Sure, this is not a side that is ready to start beating the world’s best, but nor, perhaps, it is languishing in a backbone-free zone.

Italy and Egypt may wonder how they are the ones preparing to go through airport customs while the USA looks ahead to a final-four clash with the magnificent Spaniards. The Italians will be shell-shocked at losing two straight games, one an enormous upset against Egypt and the other a comprehensive shellacking by Brazil. The Egyptians, so entertaining throughout, fluffed their lines when it mattered and were virtually unrecognizable against the U.S. from the side that looked so lively and inspired in its first two games.

Do the Americans deserve their place in the semifinals? Based on their overall body of work at the Confederations Cup, probably not. Yet the character that was on display Sunday night — a fierce determination to prove they were not as bad as everyone thought — shone out of every player.

On this night, Bob Bradley got things right, very right. That, combined with a healthy dose of luck, means he is off the hook for now.

Share your thoughts and comments below.

Is Bob Bradley the right coach to lead the U.S. into the 2010 World Cup?
Yes
No

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

The truth about the NBA Draft

I don’t know what’s going on.

Exactly, I know, what you want to hear at the tip of nine in the morning on the East coast, from a man who is paid to analyze basketball whilst separating fact from fiction based on years of experience and at least half a brain. A brilliant move on my part. Absolutely the best way to pass myself off as an NBA boffin worth regarding.

It’s the truth, though. At least I’m admitting it. And, save for a special, storied few, that’s how it goes for most of us. Nobody is going to have any real idea about what is going on with this upcoming NBA Draft until sometime well after midnight on June 26th, when the NBA forces teams to pass through yet another trade deadline.

Until then, we’re left with quite a big mess, and little that we can count on.

What’s to count on? As mentioned before, very little. And try not to think that through, as we glide from rumor to rumour to pose to feint to floater to tosser to concrete chunk. But, while you’re reading, here’s a brief snippet of what, nearly-exactly, to expect:

1). The Clippers will likely draft Blake Griffin.
2). Danny Ainge controls all the world’s media.
3). Someone from ESPN will force a horrendous Twitter joke on Thursday night.
4). Everyone, no matter how connected, will consistently be wrong, wrong, wrong way more than they’re right, right, right should they toss anything out there as absolutely concrete before late afternoon on Thursday.

This is why — and I know how skeevy it looks to go in-house with what I’m calling the gold standard — columns like this need to be read and re-read. Nothing as a faux-given, nothing as a “bank on it, buster!,” nothing meant for show. Just a good cross-section, expertly researched, about what people are talking about.

Beyond that, where can one go?

And, must you go somewhere … well, no. Don’t go anywhere. I’m sorry, but you have to sit tight until Friday morning. That’s just how it is in this time of year. You’re just going to have to be patient, you transaction-starved masses.

Really, as daft as the Minnesota Timberwolves have been over the last two decades, would they really toss Kevin Love(notes) and the 18th pick toward Memphis for the second selection in the Draft? I don’t care if Ricky Rubio might be the next Jason Kidd(notes), we do know that Kevin Love is a definite 2009-version of Kevin Love. Right down to the name. Why trade that?

And while we wouldn’t be shocked if Danny Ainge makes a personnel move involving one or several of his players built around the researched assumption that this would help improve the team he’s in charge of improving from year to year, isn’t it at all possible that little mid-June reminders about a player’s permanence and overall worth to the Boston Celtics could help the team in the long run?

Ready Ray Allen(notes) for that non-contract extension? Remind Rajon Rondo(notes) that Sherman Douglas (in his current state) could have probably scored 20 a game on Derrick Rose(notes) last spring? Give the impression of trying to anxious Celtic fans when, in fact, brass knows that the team is sort of forced into staying put because of the squad’s sheer brilliance? A good problem to have, somehow stuck in a city that’s never seen a good thing it couldn’t complain about.

The Trail Blazers? Made about 47 Draft-night deals over the last 4.7 years. Worked the phones and Paul Allen’s checkbook all the way to the best (statistical) offense in the NBA in 2008-09. Rumored to be after Hedo Turkoglu(notes), for whatever reason (you do know that Hedo would have to face, and face up, Trevor Ariza(notes) four times in the regular season alone?). Desperate to keep face? Hoping to keep the fans involved? Who knows?

Vince Carter(notes)? New Jersey shouldn’t have signed him to a massive deal in the first place. Now they want to trade him, possibly, but they kind of want to make the playoffs, but they kind of want to start over, but they sort of want to keep up appearances as they head to Brooklyn sometime in 2019, but they’d also like to trade Vince Carter, but they don’t want to trade him.

Sounds like the same wishy-washy Nets team we’ve become accustomed to, always shooting for that .500 mark. Nothing too far above, or below. Care to validate?

The Bulls? We don’t care how good you are, we just care about your Final Four appearances. One? Two? Can you take a charge? Scream real loud? Can you hit a jumper? No? Two out of three ain’t bad.

Sam Presti? He’s three years older than me. I’ve done something wrong. I’ve made a huge mistake. Nothing to do with pertinent Draft rumors, I just felt a like a good bit of Monday morning self-loathing.

Mock drafts? Stop it. Just stop it. Don’t try to guess what happens. You don’t know what’s going to happen. We know you don’t, and we don’t mind that. Stop acting as if we do mind it. Cut us some slack. Give your readers a little respect.

So here’s what I’m promising, for the rest of this nutty, nutty week.

We’ll be on this stuff. We’ll be ready, ready to pounce, ready to discuss, ready to question, ready to analyze, ready to aid you. Ready to cheer you. Ready to bring you back to earth. Ready to help.

We’re not going to take your knowledge for granted, and speak in absolutes. We know that you know better. I live my life in constant fear and dread, knowing that you know better, and that I have to work harder. I’m confident that our work in that area will pay off, this week.

One thing we can tell you, with absolute certainty? You have to have fun with it. There’s no point in paying attention to the next four days of nonsense if you can’t stave off nature, red in tooth and claw, with a well-earned guffaw or seven. You’d be missing the point if you didn’t.

Just like the Grizzlies. Hey-oh!

I do know jokes. Man, do I know the jokes.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Wimbledon rankings: Federer and Venus are No. 1

Favoritism is not a tag that has regularly hung around the neck of Roger Federer over the past year.

The world No.2’s struggles in the back end of 2008 meant that even for his Grand Slam victories at the U.S. Open and the French Open two weeks ago, he did not top the list of pundits’ pre-tournament choices.

For Wimbledon though, that all changes and Federer is widely expected to cruise to his 15th Slam title. With Rafael Nadal out of the picture, Federer’s main opposition appears to come from Andy Murray, who will be backed by hordes of screaming local fans.

Here we take a look at our first edition of Yahoo! Sports’ Wimbledon rankings, listing our favorites for the championship. They will be updated after each round.

MEN’S

1. Roger Federer - overwhelming favorite to regain title

2. Andy Murray - the hopes of a nation rest on his shoulders

3. Andy Roddick - draw has opened up for him to make a deep run

4. Novak Djokovic - wants to atone for 2008 disappointment

5. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga - performed well in his only previous Wimbledon

6. Juan Martin Del Potro - trying to break through as a leading star

7. Tommy Haas - in great form and won warm-up event in Halle

8. Fernando Gonzalez - former quarter-finalist is having a great year

WOMEN’S

1. Venus Williams - dominant on grass and hungry for a sixth title

2. Serena Williams - struggling for form but can’t be discounted

3. Svetlana Kuznetsova - French Open champ hopes to continue big summer

4. Maria Sharapova - can she last seven matches?

5. Dinara Safina - uncomfortable on grass and unlikely to triumph

6. Caroline Wozniacki - rising star looking for a Slam breakthrough

7. Victoria Azarenka - could be bothered by a hip complaint

8. Vera Zvonareva - was in spectacular form before recent injury woes

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

John Daly wrecks his bus in a tunnel, but it’s not what you think

When you’re John Daly, controversy follows you like a shadow. It doesn’t matter how much good you do or how many times you calmly go about your business, if you’re a guy with Daly’s rep there’ve got to be untold times when you’re just sitting there minding your own business, sipping a drink or quietly having dinner, and you’ll look up and see a whole crowd of people watching you, just waiting for you to freak out and start throwing chairs or whatever.

So when actual problems do happen in Daly’s life, they’re that much worse. Like this past week, when John Daly hit an Alabama tunnel with his bus. Okay, hang on, I know that sounds like the first line of a great country song, but let’s play this one out.

Daly was driving in the Bankhead Tunnel in Mobile, Alabama when pieces of his bus got sheared off and hit a car traveling in the other direction. The signs documenting the tunnel’s height were apparently a bit confusing, and once Daly was in the tunnel, he sped up to keep from getting stuck. The driver of the other car is claiming damage to his car and neck and shoulder injuries. Boom, crash, drama!

So what’s your first reaction? Whoo! Daly’s back to his old ways! Awriiiight! Not so fast. If you go check out Daly’s Twitter feed, you get a very different point of view, one that will give you a bit of a different perspective on the man and the incident:

“signs were too LATE and chains were NOT down to prevent–statistics show this happens multiple times week–No Clearance on the Tunnel AT ALL”

“chains hang from the top kinda dagle to sound the alarms but they weren’t –thank god bc they would of smashed thru my windshield”

“thank GOD me and my girls were not hurt and I wish they would make signs VISIBLE after 17 years of driving a coach never seen this before!”

“i had a fender bender with my coach and i guess super Cop called the media?? weird–because i wasn’t sited!” [sic]

“funny just read now the guy has Neck and Shoulder injuries?? From what??? something hitting his trunk?!”

“it’s ok, thats why they are called accidents–it was simply driving home unfortunately someone tryn to chase my insurance”

So there you go. From Daly’s perspective, it certainly looks like this one got blown way out of proportion, and it sure appears there was some glory-seeking along the way. Not rendering a verdict here on guilt or innocence, but I will say this: it’s gotta be hard being John Daly. Can’t a brother just ram his bus into the side of a tunnel in peace?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Pets Pass Superbug to Humans

Transmission of an infectious superbug from dogs and cats to humans, and back again, is an increasing problem, a new study finds.

The superbug, a strain of bacteria known as MRSA, has evolved a resistance to antibiotics. It has long plagued hospitals but in recent years has become more common in homes. MRSA has even invaded beaches.

Only about two years ago, scientists began to seriously suspect pets were transmitting the bacteria.

In the July edition of The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Richard Oehler of the University of South Florida College of Medicine and colleagues lay out the latest thinking on MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and pets.

The infections can be transmitted by animal bites and most threaten young children, the researchers note.

“As community-acquired strains of MRSA increase in prevalence, a growing body of clinical evidence has documented MRSA colonization in domestic animals, often implying direct acquisition of S aureus infection from their human owners,” they write. “MRSA colonization has been documented in companion animals such as horses, dogs, and cats, and these animals have been viewed as potential reservoirs of infection.”

Dog and cat bites make up about 1 percent of emergency room visits in the United States.

Some facts presented in the journal:

Women and the elderly are most at risk of being bitten by a cat.
Men in general and those aged under 20 of both sexes are most likely to be injured.
Most bite exposures occur in young children, involve unrestrained dogs on the owner’s property, and about 20 percent involve a non-neutered dog.
Risk is highest in young boys aged 5 to 9 years, due to their small size and lack of understanding of provocative behavior.

Severe infections can occur in about 20 percent of all cases, the researchers state, and are caused by Pasteurella, Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, and Capnocytophaga bacteria from the animal’s mouth, plus possibly other pathogens from the human’s skin.

“Proper treatment of dog and cat bites should involve treatment of the immediate injury (whether superficial or deep) and then management of the risk of acute infection, including washing with high pressure saline if possible, and antibiotics in selected cases,” the researchers suggest.

“Bites to the hands, forearms, neck, and head have the potential for the highest morbidity,” the scientists warn. They conclude: “Much more remains to be learned about MRSA and pet-associated human infections.”

The Truth About Deadly ‘Superbugs’
10 Deadly Diseases That Hopped Across Species
Top 10 Mysterious Diseases
Original Story: Pets Pass Superbug to Humans
LiveScience.com chronicles the daily advances and innovations made in science and technology. We take on the misconceptions that often pop up around scientific discoveries and deliver short, provocative explanations with a certain wit and style. Check out our science videos, Trivia & Quizzes and Top 10s. Join our community to debate hot-button issues like stem cells, climate change and evolution. You can also sign up for free newsletters, register for RSS feeds and get cool gadgets at the LiveScience Store.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.

Civilian casualties are a huge source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the United States. The U.N. has reported that U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the “number of Afghans shielded from violence,” and not the number of militants killed.

McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

“But if there is a compound they’re taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that’s the option they should take,” Smith said. “Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban.”

McChrystal’s predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, issued rules last fall that told commanders to set conditions “to minimize the need to resort to deadly force.”

But McChrystal’s orders will be more precise and have stronger language ordering forces to break off from battles, Smith said.

In the most recent civilian deaths case, a May 4-5 battle between U.S. and Afghan forces and militants in western Farah province killed dozens of civilians. A U.S. report last week said U.S. forces killed an estimated 26 civilians. However, Karzai’s government says 140 were killed, while an Afghan human rights group says the number is about 100.

In the latest violence, a suicide bomber on a motorbike killed seven civilians Monday when he drove into the center of an eastern Afghan city and set off explosives.

It was unclear who the bomber was targeting when he detonated a bomb on his motorbike in front of Khost city’s electric power headquarters and then explosives on his body a few minutes later, said Kuchi Naseri, a spokesman for the governor of Khost province. The Interior Ministry said seven people were killed.

There were no military or police nearby, Naseri said, but added the later blast may have been planned to hit police or officials rushing to the scene. Another 30 people in the area were wounded, he said.

In southern Kandahar province, meanwhile, another suicide bomber killed three Afghan soldiers in an attack on a convoy of troops inspecting a highway bridge for explosives. The attacker drove a car into the convoy and it exploded, said Zadi district Police Chief Niaz Mohammad Serhadi.

Serhadi said two civilians were also wounded in the blast, along with five other soldiers.

In eastern Nangarhar province, an explosion at a weapons cache killed a 6-year-old boy and wounded 20 others, police said.

It was unclear what sparked the chain reaction of explosions in caves used to store weapons and other material collected from insurgents on the outskirts of Jalalabad city, said Nangarhar province police spokesman Ghafor Khan.

“We are still investigating the incident. It is possible that the explosives ignited on their own,” Khan said.

The caves where the weapons were stored were about 100 yards (meters) away from a village, and the blast shot some shells or other items into the residential area, Khan said. Two soldiers who guarded the cache were among the wounded.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

New detector not much better catching nuke matter

Federal investigators say the government’s next generation radiation detectors are only marginally better at detecting hidden nuclear material than monitors already at U.S. ports, but would cost more than twice as much.

The machines are intended to prevent terrorists or criminals from smuggling into the U.S. a nuclear bomb or its explosive components hidden in a cargo container.

The monitors now in use can detect the presence of radiation, but they cannot distinguish between threatening and nonthreatening material. Radioactive material can be found naturally in ceramics and kitty litter, but would be of no use in making a bomb, for instance.

The Department of Homeland Security has said the new machines it is developing can distinguish between kitty litter and dangerous radioactive material and produce fewer false alarms than the current ones.

The new one are also better at detecting lightly shielded material. But the machines perform at about the same level when detecting radiological and nuclear materials hidden in a lead box or casing, the most likely way a terrorist would try to sneak the materials into this country, the Government Accountability Office said in a report to be released Monday.

The report by Congress’ investigating agency was requested by Sen. Joseph Lieberman, the Connecticut independent who is chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

The report raises the question whether the new machines, at about $822,000 each, are worth the cost if they’re not that much better than current ones that cost about $308,000.

The department believes the benefits outweigh the additional cost. But department spokeswoman Sara Kuban said Friday the department would not comment specifically on a report that was not yet public. She said the new machines still are being tested.

In March, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told Lieberman’s committee that the administration is not asking for money to purchase these machines in 2010.

“The reason is because we were not persuaded that the technology … the capacity of the technology that we needed, was actually there,” she said. “Before we come to Congress and ask for more money for new technology, we needed to see something better from the science community.”

For years, Congress and the GAO have been skeptical about the cost and testing of the new machines. The new report did not criticize the department’s latest tests, but found the results disappointing.

The new monitors “have a limited ability to detect certain nuclear materials at anything more than light shielding levels,” the report said.

The Senate’s spending plan for the department in 2010 calls for investing money to improve the current machines as well as hand-held radiation detectors now in use. Because the current technology will be used for some time, “it would seem prudent to invest in this technology,” the Senate Appropriations’ homeland security subcommittee concluded.

The acting head of the department’s Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Chuck Gallaway, recently told Congress that the new machines “will significantly improve our ability to correctly identify and interdict smuggled nuclear material and offer the ability to automatically sort threat materials from naturally occurring radioactive material.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Employers cutting back 401(k) plans

A quarter of U.S. employers have eliminated matching contributions to employee 401(k) retirement plans since September to save money amid the economy’s downturn, according to research released on Monday.

A quarter of U.S. employers also have instituted limited enrollment rather than open the savings plans to all employees, according to the study conducted for Charles Schwab Corp. by CFO Research Services.

Although the study showed 23 percent of companies have eliminated 401(k) matching contributions, most see the move as temporary, said Steve Anderson, who heads Retirement Plan Services at Charles Schwab, a financial services provider.

“Most view that as a temporary step. They don’t see that as a long-term approach,” he said.

Workers with 401(k) plans have seen their savings hit hard in the recession. A 401(k) account allows workers to defer taxes on some income and typically put the money in a mix of stock and bond mutual funds and other investments.

Companies often match all or part of employee contributions.

Asked to identify the most important feature of their company’s 401(k) plans, 87 percent of those polled said it was the company’s match, the Schwab study said.

Second most important was providing employees access to 401(k) investment advice, the study said.

Of the 107 human resource and 112 senior finance executives polled, 63 percent said employee concerns over personal finances are creating a more difficult work environment.

The online survey was conducted in March and April among executives at companies with revenues ranging from $100 million to more than $10 billion in a cross-section of industries.

More than half of the respondents worked for companies with more than 1,000 employees eligible for participation in their 401(k) plans. A statistical margin of error was not immediately available.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Obama to sign anti-smoking bill in Rose Garden

President Barack Obama is set to sign into law an anti-smoking bill that will give the Food and Drug Administration unprecedented authority to regulate tobacco.

Obama is scheduled to sign the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act during an event Monday in the Rose Garden. The law allows the FDA to reduce nicotine in tobacco products, ban candy flavorings and block labels such “low tar” and “light.” Tobacco companies also will be required to cover their cartons with large graphic warnings.

The law won’t let the FDA ban nicotine or tobacco outright, but the agency will be able to regulate what goes into tobacco products, make public the ingredients and prohibit marketing campaigns, especially those geared toward children.

Anti-smoking advocates looked forward to the bill after years of attempts to control an industry so fundamental to the U.S. that carved tobacco leaves adorn some parts of the Capitol.

Opponents from tobacco-growing states like top-producing North Carolina argued that the FDA has proved through a series of food safety failures that it’s not up to the job. They also said that instead of unrealistically trying to get smokers to quit or to prevent others from starting, lawmakers should ensure that people have other options, like smokeless tobacco.

As president, George W. Bush opposed the legislation and threatened a veto after it passed the House last year. The Obama administration, by contrast, issued a statement declaring strong support for the measure.

Obama has spoken publicly of his own struggles to quit cigarettes.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Sec’y Sebelius argues US health care too expensive

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius says the country has no choice but to revamp its health care program because current costs are “crushing families and businesses.”

Sebelius acknowledged in a nationally broadcast interview that getting legislation overhauling the system enacted won’t be easy and won’t happen quickly and without many policy debates.

Sebelius, interviewed on ABC’s “Good Morning America” Monday, said that people can must also bear more responsibility for holding costs down by taking better care of themselves. Health care adviser Melody Barnes said the administration’s plan would redirect money “so that you are efficiently and effectively using it.”

House Republican Whip Eric Cantor said a government-administered plan “will increase costs. It will reduce choices and essentially it will not allow you to keep what you have.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments