Archive for June 21st, 2009

The Wrong Ways to Grill–and How to Do It Right

In honor of Memorial Day, we at Serious Eats got eight hot grilling tips from Adam Perry Lang, a remarkable chef and grill master. Adam opened Daisy May’s BBQ in 2003, which has shocked those who thought outstanding barbecue couldn’t exist in Manhattan. He told us the wrong ways people try to grill and how to make them right.

8 Wrong Ways to Grill From Adam Perry Lang

Using a Flimsy Grill Brush: Invest in the sturdiest one you can; one with heavy tines (the coarse brush hairs) that won’t fall out. In this case, price doesn’t always indicate quality. Just get a sturdy-looking one, not necessarily a fancy one.

Using Dull Spices: Don’t ruin a great cut of meat with dull spices. Buy small amounts and buy them fresh (and often). Try anything from Ancho or Hatch chile powder to coarsely ground fresh black pepper, apple juice, or bourbon.

Cooking Meat on the Wrong Heat: Tougher, collagen-rich cuts should be on a relatively lower indirect heat. Collagen is the tough stuff that converts to gelatin when it’s cooked right and gives barbecue that stick-to-your-ribs luscious texture. Meat with a lot of intramuscular fat (the marbling), on the other hand, should cook on direct heat. Lean cuts of chicken are actually best on moderate heat.

Not Soaking Wood Chips: Often, the wood you’re using will be too dry, which won’t release that beautiful smolder. The water slows down the burn because the water has to cook off before the wood around it ignites. While this is happening, you get just the right amount of smoke.

Removing Corn From Its Husk: When grilling corn, leave the ear in its husk. This ensures that the corn will stay sweet and juicy throughout the cooking process.

Improperly Extinguishing Flare-Ups: Some chefs are very averse to them but, hey, they’re inevitable, so just embrace them. Whatever you do, don’t try to extinguish them with water. You wouldn’t put out a grease fire with water, right? When you see an unwanted flare-up, don’t panic. Just move your meat to another hot part of the grill. If you’re still getting flare-ups and are afraid that your meat might burn, retreat to the lower-temperature zone. If your grill doesn’t have a lower temp, try stacking any meat that needs a break from the heat on top of one that doesn’t.

Forgetting the Post-Grill Marination: Instead of taking meat from the cooker and putting it on a dry cutting board, I paint a layer of glaze or barbecue sauce on the board. I drizzle on oil and add salt, pepper, herbs, and things like green apple, garlic, jalapeno, lemon zest grated on the Microplane.

Running Out of Fuel: Be prepared with more than you think is enough! The last thing you want is to be caught with half a tank of propane or too little charcoal.

And check out Great Grilling That’s Also Good for You.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

What Chain-Food Favorites Cost in Exercise

My “two scoops won’t hurt and neither will these french fries” approach to eating doesn’t lend itself well to swimsuit season. Although the beach treks may have begun, there is time to make change. So, let me have it. What’s that ice cream going to cost me in workout minutes? To tell us is Charles Stuart Platkin, also known as the Diet Detective. He is the author of five books and and host of WE TV’s I Want To Save Your Life. Here is his report on what some of our chain-food favorites should cost us in time spent doing common exercises…

Note: Calorie content of foods are based on official website information at the time of publication. Minutes of exercise are averages based on a 155-pound person. The greater the weight of the person the more calories burned per minute.

DONUT
Dunkin Donuts Chocolate Frosted Donut (230 calories)
59 minutes of walking (3 mph).

BREAKFAST SANDWICH
McDonald’s Egg McMuffin (300 calories)
32 minutes of running (5 mph).

CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIE
Panera Chocolate Chipper (440 calories)
62 minutes of biking (10-11.9 mph).

PIZZA
Pizza Hut Large Hand-Tossed Style Cheese Pizza (1 slice; 320 calories)
39 minutes of swimming (slow to moderate laps).

CINNAMON ROLL
Starbucks Cinnamon Roll (500 calories, varies by location)
85 minutes of dancing.

HAMBURGER
Burger King Original Whopper With Cheese (770 calories)
94 minutes of swimming (slow to moderate laps).

BROWNIE
Au Bon Pain Chocolate Chip Brownie (380 calories).
129 minutes of yoga (Hatha style).

FRIES
Wendy’s Large French Fries (540 calories)
77 minutes of biking (10-11.9 mph).

ICE CREAM
Häagen-Dazs Vanilla Ice Cream (0.5 cup; 270 calories)
29 minutes of running (5 mph).

BURRITO
Taco Bell Burrito Supreme, Beef (410 calories)
70 minutes of dancing.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Ice-Cream Battle in the Freezer Aisle

Serious Eats wanted to find the best ice cream in the supermarket. For our taste test, we used vanilla because it’s a clean classic without any gimics to hide behind. None of this candied bacon ice cream or ramen ice cream — just vanilla. Plus, vanilla is the best for summer pie season. We tried six national ice cream brands and judged on a 1-5 scale for texture, richness, and vanilla-ness.
HÄAGEN-DAZS: 4.5
Traditional Taste: Yes, definitely that straight-forward vanilla flavor.
Texture: Very nice mouthfeel.
Vanilla-ness: Tasted like real vanilla, not the fake stuff.

This was a unanimous crowd favorite. It had all the trademarks of a good vanilla ice cream: Silky, smooth, and major potential as an apple pie buddy, and unlike some of the others, it actually tasted like vanilla. Keep up the good work, Mr. Dazs.

BEN & JERRY’S: 4.2
Traditional Taste: This one did the classic flavor right.
Texture: Smooth and not airy.
Vanilla-ness: No visible vanilla beans, but you can sure taste them.

Though we’re used to the more psychedelic flavors from the tie-dyed Vermont ice creamery (Cherry Garcia, Half-Baked, Brownie Batter), this one did the classic flavor right. They didn’t get caught up in the extra noise (no offense to the cookie dough balls of the world)—just a true vanilla that purists will like.

BLUE BUNNY: 3
Traditional taste: Not especially. It tasted fake.
Texture: Creamy, and not too icy.
Vanilla-ness: More like “vanilla” than vanilla.

This one tasted like someone killed a bunch of vanilla wafers for the flavor. You know that boxed-cookie vanilla flavor? The alcoholic aftertaste was a little disconcerting, but also kind of pleasing.

BREYERS: 2.4
Traditional taste: Yes. Many people grew up on this, and it remains an iconic grocery-store flavor of ice cream.
Texture: Super airy, as if they pumped it with a bike tire inflator.
Vanilla-ness: Visible black bean specks gives this one “the look,” but doesn’t deliver.

Once you get past the appearance of vanilla-bean particles, it’s just an airy white mountain that lacks butterfatty oomph.

HORIZON: 2.25
Traditional taste: Nothing traditional tasting here.
Texture: Creamy, but seems like it could easily get icy in the freezer.
Vanilla-ness: Eh, tasted more like straight milk.

The organic milk company knows how to make milk, but maybe they should stick to liquids. Is there such thing as milk-flavored ice cream? This one had very little vanilla happening. But you can almost hear the moooo-ing cows graze on pesticide-free grass, which is a benefit for some.

EDY’S: 2.25
Traditional taste: Yes, but compared to all the others, it wasn’t exciting. Granted, we are ice cream snobs.
Texture: Like halfway defrosted cool whip.
Vanilla-ness: Lacking.

Richness? Ha. And once again, the faux vanilla specks didn’t translate to actual vanilla flavor. (Note: it’s still rather edible, but when up against stiff competition, it was the big loser.)

We’d love to know your favorite brand of vanilla ice cream, nationally or locally…

And to make your own vanilla ice cream, try this recipe.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Scary-Easy Ways to Eat 1,000 Calories

Hungry Girl’s here to inform you just how easy it is to rack up over 1,000 calories in one sitting. Don’t let this happen to you…
The Sandwich Scenario:
You’re in the mood for a sandwich, so you pull out two hearty slices of wheat bread and spread a tablespoon of mayo on each slice. You add a couple slices of Swiss cheese, about four slices of ham, plus some lettuce and tomato. A can of soda and a handful of potato chips round out this pretty basic lunch. As unassuming as it sounds, you just racked up 1,015 calories! Take a look at the breakdown…

Bread = 200 calories
Mayo = 115 calories
Cheese = 212 calories
Ham = 183 calories
Soda = 150 calories
Chips = 155 calories

Hungry Girl Tips: Go for light bread, low-fat mayo, 2% Swiss cheese, and extra-lean ham. Ditch the can of regular soda for Coke Zero. And choose Baked! Lay’s instead of regular chips. Now that meal will only cost you about 415 calories. MUCH BETTER!

The At-Work Scenario:
Your boss brought in a pretty nice spread of bagels, muffins, pastries, and fancy coffee drinks for the team. How can you refuse? You grab a large bagel and smear a few tablespoons of cream cheese onto each half. You snag one of the whipped-cream-topped mocha drinks to wash it down. And to keep it healthy and balanced, you spoon out a small cup of fruit salad. Now it’s not even lunchtime, and you just downed 1,000 calories. Ouch. Here’s how it adds up…

Bagel = 360 calories
Cream Cheese = 202 calories
Mocha Coffee Drink w/ Whipped Cream = 363 calories
Fruit Salad = 75 calories

Hungry Girl Tips: No need to avoid the breakfast spread altogether. Grab an English muffin instead of that doughy bagel, and spread a tablespoon of jelly on it instead of all that cream cheese. Treat yourself to a small nonfat mocha drink without the whipped cream. And enjoy that fruit salad… in fact, DOUBLE the portion! You can have all that for less than HALF the calories.

The Drive-Thru Scenario:
You’re craving fast food, and you’re pressed for time. So you pull up to McDonald’s and order a Big Mac, medium fries, and a medium Coke. That comes to 1,130 calories, without any super-sizing whatsoever. Look…

Big Mac = 540 calories
Fries = 380 calories
Coke = 210 calories

Hungry Girl Tips: Get the Premium Grilled Chicken Sandwich without the mayo, an order of Apple Dippers with the Low-Fat Caramel Sauce, and a Diet Coke. Now you’re down to 475 calories, and you didn’t even have to leave McDonald’s.

The Dinner-Out Scenario:
You’re at Chili’s with 3 friends, and you’re craving those Boneless Buffalo Wings. But you decide to get your fix with the Boneless Buffalo Chicken SALAD. (Aren’t you smart!) Since you avoided the appetizer temptation, you agree to share that Chocolate Chip Paradise Pie with your 3 pals. Hate to break it to you, but you hit 1,000 calories before you even stuck your fork into that dessert. The salad plus your share of dessert comes to 1,468 calories! Here’s how…

Salad = 1,070 calories
1/4th of Dessert = 398 calories

Hungry Girl Tips: Instead of that salad, order the Guiltless Buffalo Chicken Sandwich. And get your OWN dessert — the Sweet Shot Red Velvet Cake. That comes to only 636 calories. NOT BAD!

And check out these Fast-Food Gems for Dieters.

LOOK! IT’S HUNGRY GIRL’S NEW BOOK!

Hungry Girl 200 Under 200: 200 Recipes Under 200 Calories is packed with TWO HUNDRED easy and delicious recipes, each with less than 200 calories a serving! Check it out RIGHT NOW!!

For a daily dose of guilt-free tips, tricks, food finds, recipes and more, visit hungry-girl.com and sign up for free daily emails!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Deciphering the Ben Gordon ‘promise’

Who’s trying to fool whom, ‘ere?

Whom is trying to fool who, even?

I’d like to think we’re on to the whoms and whos in this situation, but as it’s been for the third summer in a row, discussing rumors about Ben Gordon(notes) in a forum like this leaves open the possibility that you’re completely re-telling someone’s fabricated talking points, while ignoring the truth on the other side of the fence. Or vice versa, with the fence still in the picture.

The other day, Sam Smith of Bulls.com reported a supposed “$11 million promise from the Pistons,” sent Ben Gordon’s way. The idea itself, without even trying to consider the sources of the bluster or bollock, is enough to make your head spin.

Starting with the fact that Ben Gordon is not worth $11 million a year, not in the first year of a new contract (he’s an unrestricted free agent, starting July 1st), not in the final year, and not as an average. He scores, he works his tail off during the offseason, and he scores. But he does absolutely nothing else. And I like Ben Gordon. A lot.

Beyond that, the “promise” idea gets even more confusing.

The Pistons, with Rodney Stuckey(notes) and Rip Hamilton already in place, would seem to be set in the backcourt. Even if Stuckey is a bit overrated and Hamilton declining to the point of being about average (with a ridiculous contract), you wouldn’t seem to want to add Gordon to that mix, and set up yet another rotation soap opera with Gordon in the middle.

Trading Hamilton and his onerous contract would seem to be one way out of that conundrum, but with Rip working as a significant part of Worldwide Wes’ stable, Joe Dumars wouldn’t really want to make Rip unhappy, would he? Sure, he’d still get paid no matter what team he’d play for, but after reading about the emotional state that Chauncey Billups’(notes) Detroit departure left CB and his former team in, wouldn’t Hamilton react the same way?

Then there’s the idea that the Pistons, flush with cap space that could possibly be parlayed into 2010 room, would take themselves out of the running for a franchise talent by handing an eight-figure deal to Gordon. Makes no sense.

And why would the Pistons toss something out there so quickly? It’s a long offseason, and the team will have plenty of cap space. And cap space doesn’t have to mean signing the best free agent available (or, apparently, one of the worst; as Chicago did back in the summer of 2006). It means you can swing trades for players making huge gobs of money that teams don’t want to pay, while absorbing any salary difference into your flexible payroll, legally.

Then there’s the whole tampering issue. If there has been any sort of communication between the Pistons, their reps, and Gordon’s agent, then we have a team in direct violation of the NBA’s collective bargaining agreement.

So, if we can safely assume that there isn’t much fire behind this little late-June plume, who passes this info on to Smith? Who stands to benefit the most?

Gordon’s agent? Something to ease his client into thinking that there is significant interest in his services? Something to help him get over the fact that he continually turned down contract extension after contract extension last year? And a desperate move to get the Bulls or even the Pistons to come to the table with bigger checks in hand?

The Pistons? Letting their fan base know that they plan on doing big business this summer, a year removed from an offseason that started with Joe Dumars essentially threatening to completely revamp his roster through trades, only to wait until the season started before submarining his team (which may not have been a bad thing; as he grabbed cap space and revealed Rasheed Wallace(notes) to be the un-re-signable prat that he is) by trading for Allen Iverson(notes).

The Bulls? Quick to throw out a number that a good chunk of the team’s fan base (and certainly the majority of the fair-weather folk) will see as outrageous for a player of Gordon’s abilities? Steeling the fan base (and, possibly, their roster holdovers) for Gordon’s likely leaving?

If the luxury tax does indeed drop a few million, Chicago is right at the luxury tax level with the current roster, sans Gordon, plus their two first-round draft picks. So even the cheapest re-signing efforts would put Chicago (long one of the NBA’s most profitable franchise, if not the most profitable franchise) into the luxury tax strata, an area owner Jerry Reinsdorf (despite his profits) has shown no interest in spending any amount of time in, no matter the on-court payoff. Or off-court, apparently.

And it’s sickening how much of this post is coming true.

So what’s your take on the spin? Where did Sam get his spin, and why was it spun his way? Let us know below.

Sure beats talking about the Timberwolves.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Phenomenal Swag: Kobe Bryant life-size bobblehead

Trey Kerby of The Blowtorch searches high and low across the Internet for NBA-related goods you never knew you needed. You know, phenomenal swag. Email Ball Don’t Lie any relevant products you find here.

Hey, basketball fan. Do you hate sleeping? Enjoy scaring small children? Abhor personal contact with the opposite sex? Or maybe you just have an unquenchable desire for Kobe Bryant(notes) memorabilia. No matter what your reason, I’ve got the perfect product for you: a life-size Kobe Bryant bobblehead.

For just $13,000 — yes, that’s right, count those zeros! — you can guarantee that neighborhood kids will run, not walk, past your abode. You can usher in a new era in awkwardness, as the room housing BobbleKobe becomes everybody’s least favorite. Why waste time sleeping when you can worry about this enormous monstrosity toppling on to you, smothering your every breath. And of course, that haunting grin, which is sure to guarantee you endless nights alone.

All in all, a great investment piece.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

The 10-man rotation, starring Dwight and friends

A look around the league and the web that covers it. It’s also important to note that the rotation order and starting nods aren’t always listed in order of importance. That’s for you, dear reader, to figure out.

C: Dwight’s Twitpic, via NBA Off-Season 2009. Dwight was sure having fun with his iPhone yesterday …
PF: NBA FanHouse. Phil Jackson will donate proceeds of his “X” hat to American Indian College Fund.
SF: The Wages Of Wins Journal. Pondering potential first round point guards.
SG: The 700 Level. Andre Iguodala(notes) is being sued by “hip hop model” Clayanna Warthen for child support.
PG: That NBA Lottery Pick. One thing you can say about Westphal, guy played a mean game of HORSE.
6th: The Scores Report. What is the NBA Draft class of 2006 worth?
7th: Deadspin. Tim Legler likes to party and apparently sponsors some sort of team with his namesake.
8th: Friedell’s Blog. Wade isn’t sure how many points he’d spot President Obama if they played 1-on-1.
9th: SRI. Ron Artest(notes) talks about his buddies smoking blunts while golfing, steroids and Twitter.
10th: Silver Screen & Roll. C.A. Clark: “The Lakers don’t care what you think. They don’t care if you love them or hate them. They don’t care if you think their effort was commendable or shameful. All they care about, all they’ve ever cared about, is the pot (ball?) of gold at the end of the rainbow.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Mickelson hits hybrid to remember

Phil Mickelson gave his adoring fans a shot to remember Saturday in the U.S. Open—a remarkable hybrid that none of the Bethpage Black regulars would even think to try, let alone have the club to play it.

From 164 yards in rough left of the 15th fairway, he opened the face of the hybrid as if playing a wedge and launched a high shot—the crowd cheering as the ball took flight, trying to help it to the elevated green—that stopped 25 feet from the hole.

“This is a special club I actually made, taking the back part of the hybrid out so that I can open it way up and get through that thick rough,” Mickelson said.

He was 1 under—seven strokes behind leader Ricky Barnes—after rounds of 69 and 70 and a nifty par save on the first hole in third round before rain stopped play.

Unsure he would even play the event after learning wife Amy has breast cancer, Lefty missed the birdie putt on 15, walking away with his second par on the 459-yard par 4—the hole where Tiger Woods made a 6 Friday and bogeyed from the fairway Saturday.
“The way the left side kind of cuts in, it’s just awkward to my eye,” Mickelson said. “I have a tendency to miss it left there. The lie wasn’t great. It was in the thick rough, but it wasn’t horrible. Short, it’s terrible there. And with those pins just on that top section, it’s very difficult to get up and down.

“I thought I could get a 5-iron out of that rough up by the green. And I was concerned that it might come out a little dead and be short. I took the hybrid and dug in after it and was able to get it there. I actually was trying to play over the green and get it past, but it came out dead and turned out perfect.”

Mickelson returned to the soggy course early Saturday to complete the final eight holes of his second round. He was even par in rain-free conditions, dropping a stroke on the par-5 13th for the second straight day and getting back to red numbers with his second birdie on the par-3 17th.

On No. 1 in the third round, he drove in the deep left rough, hacked out to the fairway, pitched 25 feet past the hole and made the par putt. He drove in the left rough No. 2 before hard rain washed out play for the rest of the day.

“I like the position I’m in,” Mickelson said after the second round. “I think that if I can get hot with the putter, I like my chances in the next two rounds.”

And there will be two more rounds, no matter the weather, however long it takes.

“It’s nice knowing from a player’s standpoint, because it allows you to play a certain way,” said Mickelson, never worse than fourth in four previous U.S. Opens in New York. “I wasn’t out there pressing today forcing birdies, thinking this might be 54 holes. Knowing that it’s 72 is helpful.”

While the rain has made the greens receptive, Mickelson figured the Bethpage layout has lost only a little of its bite.

“I wouldn’t say it hasn’t shown its teeth,” Mickelson said. “This is a very difficult golf course. It’s long. The rough is very difficult, and just a very few yards off the fairways in spots is literally lose your ball or unplayable lie. … Ernie Els, one of the best players in the game, was 15 over. It’s not easy.”

That was evident on the 605-yard 13th, where Mickelson’s drive embedded in grass on the bank of a bunker, forcing him to take a penalty stroke for an unplayable lie. He called for a ruling, but PGA Tour official Mark Dusbabek— called in by Mickelson for a second opinion—determined the ball didn’t break the surface of the ground.

“I don’t disagree with the ruling. I understand the rule,” Mickelson said. “But I still wanted to get it double-checked.”

He didn’t need to check twice to know he got a break from the weather that plagued Woods and the other half of the draw.

“We had a great end of the draw,” Mickelson said.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

NKorea criticizes US nuclear protection of South

North Korea has accused the United States of plotting atomic war against the communist regime, saying President Barack Obama’s recent reaffirmation of nuclear protection of South Korea only exposed his government’s intention to attack.

In what would be the first test for the new U.N. sanctions against the North, South Korean media also reported Sunday that a North Korean ship sailing toward Myanmar via Singapore was being shadowed by the U.S. military over suspicion that it may be carrying illicit weapons.

U.S. officials said Thursday that the U.S. military had begun tracking the ship, Kang Nam, which left a North Korean port Wednesday.

South Korean television network YTN, citing an unidentified intelligence source in the South, reported that the U.S. suspected the 2,000-ton-class ship was carrying missiles and other related weapons toward Myanmar — which has faced an arms embargo from the United States and the European Union and has reportedly bought weapons from North Korea.

The report said the U.S. has also deployed a navy destroyer and has been using satellites to track the ship.

South Korea’s Defense Ministry, Unification Ministry and the National Intelligence Service said they could not confirm the report.

Tension on the Korean peninsula has spiked since the North defiantly conducted its second nuclear test on May 25. North Korea later declared it would bolster its atomic bomb-making program and threatened war in protest of U.N. sanctions for its test.

Obama reaffirmed Washington’s security commitment to South Korea, including through U.S. nuclear protection, after a meeting Tuesday in Washington with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak. Obama also said the U.N. sanctions will be aggressively enforced.

In its first response to the summit, North Korea’s government-run weekly Tongil Sinbo said that Obama’s comments only revealed a U.S. plot to invade the North with nuclear weapons.

“It’s not a coincidence at all for the U.S. to have brought numerous nuclear weapons into South Korea and other adjacent sites, staging various massive war drills opposing North Korea every day and watching for a chance for an invasion,” said the commentary published Saturday.

The weekly also said the North will also “surely judge” the Lee government for participating in a U.S.-led international campaign to “stifle” the North.

North Korea says its nuclear program is a deterrent against the U.S., which it routinely accuses of plotting to topple its communist regime. Washington, which has 28,500 troops in South Korea, has repeatedly said it has no such intention and has no nuclear weapons deployed there.

On Saturday, a South Korean Foreign Ministry official said Seoul has proposed five-way talks with the U.S., China, Russia and Japan to find a new way to deal with the North’s threats.

The U.S. and Japan have agreed to participate, while China and Russia have yet to respond, the official told The Associated Press, requesting anonymity because he was discussing a plan still in the works.

North Korea and the five countries began negotiating under the so-called “six-party talks” in 2003 with the aim of giving the communist regime economic aid and other concessions in exchange for dismantling its nuclear program. In April, however, the North said it was pulling out of the talks in response to international criticism of its controversial April 5 long-range rocket launch.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

7 militants killed by Pakistan citizens’ militia

A citizens’ militia trying to drive out the Taliban killed seven militants in a two-hour clash in Pakistan’s troubled northwest, police said Sunday, as the president claimed the entire country backs the battle against the extremists.

Ejaz Ahmed, police chief in the Upper Dir region, said another militant was wounded in the fighting late Saturday night near the village of Patrak, about four miles (seven kilometers) east of Dir Khas, the region’s main town and district headquarters.

Several civilian militias, known as lashkars, have emerged in Upper Dir since a suicide bombing on a mosque two weeks ago that was blamed on the Taliban killed at least 33 people. The militias carry out patrols and have been pursuing remnants of Taliban who had tried to expand their influence into the area.

Ahmed said scores of militants have been trapped and killed by the militias in several villages, with police cutting off escape routes. The Taliban who were killed Saturday had been trying to flee when they came across the militiamen and opened fire, he said.

“Due to heavy losses, militants have been attempting to escape the area under cover of dark, and last night’s incident was one such attempt,” Ahmed said. He said no civilians were killed in the fighting.

The report could not immediately be confirmed due to military restrictions on media access to the area.

In the most striking example of growing anti-Taliban sentiment, up to 1,600 tribesmen in Upper Dir cleared three villages of Taliban fighters two weeks ago, killing at least six militants.

President Asif Ali Zardari said the military has been having success against the Taliban because Pakistan’s people are backing the troops.

“The operations before this were not successful because they did not have a public support,” Zardari said in a speech marking what would have been the 56th birthday of his late wife, former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, who was assassinated 18 months ago.

A majority of Pakistanis oppose extremism, but the Taliban have gained influence in several areas — including Dir and Swat Valley — in recent years. The militants also have some support in tribal regions near the border with Afghanistan, where U.S. officials say they plot attacks on American troops across the border.

Previous army offensives against militants have failed to drive them out completely, and the government has struck a series of peace deals that have eventually fallen apart.

The Swat offensive seems to have enjoyed an unprecedented level of public support, but that could erode if the government is perceived to have failed more than 2 million people displaced by the fighting or if civilian casualties mount.

Troops continued Sunday to try to clear a road blocked by the Taliban in the nearby South Waziristan tribal area, where shelling and bombing of suspected militant targets has been increased and ground troops have been moving into position in the past week since the government announced the military would go after Pakistan’s Taliban commander, Baitullah Mehsud.

A military statement Saturday said 37 extremists died when troops retaliated after the militants blocked the main South Waziristan road near the town of Sarwaki. They were the first militant casualties of the offensive in South Waziristan to be confirmed by the army. There was no word about further casualties in the army update on the situation Sunday.

But two intelligence officials said six suspected militants were killed when a military jet pounded their positions minutes after they fired three rockets that missed a military camp. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to media.

South Waziristan is Mehsud’s tribal stronghold, a chunk of the remote and rugged mountainous region along Pakistan’s northwestern border with Afghanistan where heavily armed tribesmen hold sway and al-Qaida and Taliban leaders are believed to be hiding.

Pakistan is shifting the focus in its fight against militancy from the northwestern Swat Valley, where troops have been pushing Taliban fighters back for almost two months, to a new and much tougher battleground in the Afghan border region.

Washington supports both operations, and sees them as a measure of nuclear-armed Pakistan’s resolve to take on a growing insurgency after years of failed military campaigns and faltering peace deals. The battle in the tribal region could also help the war in Afghanistan because the area has been used by militants to launch cross-border attacks on U.S. and other troops.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments