Archive for June 15th, 2009

Coalition heavyweights embrace Netanyahu speech

Top figures in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s hawkish government lined up behind him Monday after he declared conditional support for Palestinian independence, despite the historically hard line they have taken on territorial concessions.

The hard-liners appeared buoyed by the nationalistic tone of Netanyahu’s speech and tough conditions he attached after caving to U.S. pressure to endorse a Palestinian state. Palestinians pronounced his offer a nonstarter because of these same conditions.

After decades of opposition, Netanyahu announced on national TV late Sunday that he was prepared to begin negotiations on the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. But he insisted that a future Palestine be demilitarized and rejected the aspirations of Palestinian refugees to return to homes in Israel.

Those conditions, along with demands that Israel retain sovereignty over a united Jerusalem and continue to expand West Bank settlements, enraged the Palestinians, who accused him of sabotaging negotiations.

“He announced a series of conditions and qualifications that render a viable, independent and sovereign Palestinian state impossible,” said Palestinian official Saeb Erekat.

But it won him support from hard-liners inside his government who historically have been cool to the idea of Palestinian independence.

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, the most powerful hard-liner in Netanyahu’s government, said the prime minister’s speech outlined “the balance between our aspirations for peace and the aspiration for security.”

“Netanyahu opened the door to the Palestinians and the Arab nations to begin peace talks, and we hope the other side will take up the offer to renew negotiations,” Lieberman said after the speech.

Eli Yishai, head of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish Shas party, said Netanyahu “stressed his commitment to plausible peace and security.”

Shas, Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu and the centrist Labor Party are Netanyahu’s main coalition allies. Labor has long endorsed the concept of a Palestinian state.

Netanyahu spoke after months of pressure from Washington to endorse Palestinian statehood, as successive Israeli governments before his have done.

The Palestinians want to establish a state that includes all of the West Bank and east Jerusalem — areas captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast War. Netanyahu ruled out sharing Jerusalem and made no mention of uprooting Jewish settlements built in the West Bank. Instead, he said existing settlements should be allowed to expand while negotiations proceed.

Netanyahu’s spokesman, Mark Regev, said Monday the Israeli leader had merely laid out an opening position that outlined his vision of a future peace agreement.

“These are not preconditions, but they’re essential requirements for success in these talks,” he told reporters.

Vice Premier Moshe Yaalon, a former military chief, said the speech was important because of the Palestinian reaction.

“I think what was presented yesterday reflects a broad Israeli consensus,” Yaalon told Army Radio. “I think it was important to juxtapose the broad Israeli consensus with the Palestinian rejectionism, which we exposed yesterday.”

Most dissent came from opposition politicians and backbenchers in Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party.

“The prime minister knows that if he promotes it, he will face a strong opposition within the party, within the coalition,” said Likud lawmaker Danny Danon. “Deep inside himself, Prime Minister Netanyahu knows that a Palestinian state poses a major threat for the security of Israel.”

But among Likud’s heavyweights, even Cabinet Minister Benny Begin — who left Netanyahu’s first government more than a decade ago following territorial concessions to the Palestinians — did not openly clash with him.

“I clearly do not accept the concept of the establishment of a sovereign, Arab state in Judea, Samari and the Gaza Strip,” he said, using the biblical name for the West Bank. “History has shown that a sovereign power, even if its powers are limited at the outset, later throws off these restrictions,” he told Israel Radio.

But he didn’t threaten to resign.

In other developments, international Mideast envoy Tony Blair visited the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, where he urged quick repairs to infrastructure damaged in Israel’s recent offensive.

Gaza’s reconstruction has been stifled by a partial blockade by Israel and Egypt that has been in force since the Islamic militant Hamas seized control of the territory in 2007.

It was Blair’s second visit to Gaza since he became envoy in 2007. Blair did not meet with Hamas, which is boycotted by the international community as a terrorist group.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Lakers pull away from Magic, win championship in five games

Two teams battled through the 2009 Finals, providing three close games in five chances, but even with that attempt at parity, it’s clear that the Los Angeles Lakers were just a giant step above the Orlando Magic.

The current Magic, mind you. Orlando fans will be for years ruing the absence of the Jameer Nelson(notes) that traipsed all over the Lakers twice during the regular season, leading the Magic to two close wins over the eventual champion, but the current Nelson (obviously injured, averaging about four points and three assists, making about a third of his shots from the floor) could not put the Magic over the top.

And while Kobe Bryant(notes) (30 points in the win, five assists, four blocks) was a deserved MVP, averaging 32.4 points and 7.4 assists per game alongside stout on-ball and help defense, this was truly a team effort.

Pau Gasol(notes) (14 points, 15 rebounds, four blocks) came out of nowhere to provide what was at times a dominant defensive effort, even if his work wasn’t rewarded with eye-catching numbers or national TV plaudits. Derek Fisher’s(notes) (13 points on seven shots) heroics in Game 4 have been well documented, Trevor Ariza(notes) (15 points, two steals) helped put the Magic away in Game 5, and Lamar Odom(notes) (17 points, 10 rebounds) was an all-around terror on both sides of the ball for each of the five games.

The Magic were a worthy opponent, and both of the team’s losses in those close games could have gone their way but for an inch or two, but it’s hard not to regard the Lakers as the better team by a good bound.

That said, it’s hard not to appreciate just how far the Magic have come.

Nobody had this team as anything more than second or possibly third-round fodder entering the season, or even after the team raced out to place themselves amongst the elite of the East during the regular season. Nelson endured what was then classified a season-ending injury midway through the season, and though the Magic rallied around replacement point guard Rafer Alston(notes) (12 points on 15 shots in Game 5, three assists, three turnovers) to storm into the playoffs, the struggles didn’t end there.

Orlando gave up home-court advantage in the first round against Philadelphia, then was forced to play without its best player in Dwight Howard(notes) (11 points, 10 rebounds, three blocks) after the All-Star center was suspended for Game 6 of that series for throwing an elbow at 76ers big man Samuel Dalembert(notes).

The team rallied to win that one on the road, before downing the defending champion Boston Celtics in a Game 7 in Boston, a remarkable accomplishment even if Kevin Garnett(notes) was stuck in street clothes on the Boston bench.

And though the Magic seemed to have their way with the Cleveland Cavaliers in the regular season, few even allowed the Magic a sixth or seventh game before the Cavaliers (owners of the NBA’s best regular-season record) were to dismiss them. Instead, Orlando rolled, winning in six games, making the franchise’s second appearance in the NBA Finals.

And though the close losses in Games 2 and 4 might sting, this ending was probably appropriate. The Magic worked, worked hard, but the Lakers were just that much better.

“I don’t know,” Stan Van Gundy said after the game, “if you can console anybody. It’s very, very difficult.”

Van Gundy seemed shocked, after the loss, by the swiftness of it all. At just two and a half hours, Game 5 was a quick one, especially compared to the two overtime games in this series.

“I’m not trying to be an ass,” he warned, toward the end of his press conference. “Sometimes I do try to be an ass, but I’m not trying to be an ass — I’m just not at the point of being able to reflect right now. I expected to be getting ready for Game 6 and getting on a plane to L.A.”

His team, in the locker room, wasn’t as shell-shocked. But even with no new game to play on Tuesday, or until October, the bounce-back effect that players seem to have following these losses that Van Gundy pointed out before the game seemed to have taken hold.

The Lakers, on the other hand, were loving life. You got the feeling that they knew how good they were, milling around the locker room, but without the perceived batch of arrogance that they were accused of during the first three rounds of the playoffs.

Instead, the champions seemed almost ready to play another series. Almost ready to take on another Finals, or another season, or the Magic in a best of nine. Confident, yes, but also appreciating the moment and what it represented.

For Kobe Bryant, a needed end to the nonsense about his supposed inability to win a championship on his own. As if that’s ever happened in the history of team sports.

For Phil Jackson, a 10th Finals victory as a coach, and 12th overall (a fact few seem to bring up). Soon after the final buzzer, Jackson was handed a Lakers hat with a large “X” emblazoned on the front, a reference to his ten rings as a coach, a gift from his children and an idea fashioned by his agent, Todd Musberger.

For Pau Gasol, an end to the cries of “soft,” a reputation partially earned, but a former trait of his game that hardly mitigated his overall brilliance. Gasol helped squash some of that chatter with a strong performance on a Christmas Day game against the Celtics this season, but to those who were paying attention, his defensive work on Dwight Howard in this series was an all-timer.

For Derek Fisher, a logical end to a five-year run that few could have predicted. Fisher fled a sinking Lakers ship in 2004, just as Shaquille O’Neal(notes) was demanding a trade, with Phil Jackson already gone, and Kobe Bryant flirting as a free agent with both the Clippers and the Chicago Bulls.

Signed to an outrageous contract with the Golden State Warriors, Fisher was then traded to the Utah Jazz, watched as his daughter Tatum was diagnosed with retinoblastoma, willingly voided the final years of that outrageous contract in order to move to a city that could provide better care for his daughter, and then signed for less money with the Lakers in the summer of 2007.

For Andrew Bynum(notes), an end to the embarrassment. He probably came back too early after tearing his MCL, and now he has until the fall to rehabilitate, with nobody referring to him as anything but a champion.

For Trevor Ariza and Lamar Odom, they hope, enough good memories to force Los Angeles’ hand in paying the luxury tax and keeping their pair of dynamic free agent forwards in the fold.

For Luke Walton(notes), it means he’s halfway to his father’s mark of two NBA championships. And, hopefully, it also means a six-pack or two for Walton, who was milling around the press area following the game, wondering if the media was given free beer, and if they had any to share. No, Luke. And even if we did … no.

For Los Angeles, the city’s first championship in seven years, and the franchise’s 15th overall. Here’s hoping we don’t wake to any news of nonsense coming out of the L.A. area as a result.

The game itself seemed Los Angeles’ all along.

The Magic roared out to an early, slim lead, but an inability to hit three-pointers or keep the Lakers off the offensive glass kept Los Angeles close. By the second quarter, Trevor Ariza’s defense on Hedo Turkoglu(notes) (both on ball, and in causing turnovers) and 12 points allowed the Lakers to pull away.

The Magic had their chances to whittle away at the Laker lead, but the Los Angeles defense was too strong, and Orlando frittered away too many offensive chances (missed free throws, missed open shots, all sorts of misses in the paint) to make a real run at the eventual champs.

Though Orlando nearly got it down to single digits in the final minutes, it was never that close. The Lakers’ defense was too much, and the Magic were out of offensive answers.

In all, a satisfying Finals. The likely storyline from here on out will probably have to do with this being one of the more closely-contested 4-1 Finals series’ anyone can remember. The pundits wouldn’t be wrong in that sentiment, but they’d also be doing the champions a disservice by not regarding them as a clear step above.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Behind the Box Score, where we have a champion

Apparently the only thing I’m left with, after 82 games and two months of playoff basketball, is just to plead with you to appreciate what we have left.

That’s nothing new. I’m spending a good chunk of these BtBs throughout the year begging you to have fun with and coo over a game that keeps evolving and changing and growing before our very eyes. And today, the morning following the final game of the season, my effort is best suited to be spent telling you just how great the Los Angeles Lakers are.

And, just a step or two behind, how great those Orlando Magic were.

The Lakers, in a way, are still active. They’re all we have left. They haven’t been defeated, or knocked out. Unlike those other 29 teams.

The Magic? They lost the fourth game of a seven-game series on Sunday night. And no matter how close things were in three of the five games that were played, no matter how this nearly turned into a series that may have been completely reversed had things spun Orlando’s way in Games 2 and 4 … spin it did. It did, it did, and they dead.

But before they were dead, man, they were great.

The Orlando Magic were a fantastic basketball team. An absolute joy to watch from the beginning, even if Dwight Howard’s(notes) offensive foibles or Rashard Lewis’(notes) aversion to contact had you bouncing off the walls in frustration at times. They cared so much, on nights when no other team seemed to. They worked so hard.

They were a team that so many got completely wrong. Not just an underrated defensive team, but the best defensive team in the NBA during 2008-09, while still boasting the offensive firepower that led a whole heap of pundits (usually on a television set) to call them an offensive-based outfit.

Sure, Kevin Garnett’s(notes) absence in Boston may have vaulted Orlando to the top in those defensive charts. And who knows how the Rockets would have fared had Aaron Brooks(notes) not started at point guard for half the regular season. We don’t know how those hypotheticals would have turned out.

Here’s what we do know. Rashard Lewis spent the entire season at power forward for the Orlando Magic. Jameer Nelson(notes), who can just barely see over the top of Avery Johnson on the ESPN set, started half a season at point guard. Hardly 2/5ths of a defensive lineup for the ages.

And though the team took in heady defensive play from Hedo Turkoglu(notes) and Mickael Pietrus(notes), rookie Courtney Lee(notes) played 41 percent of his team’s minutes at shooting guard during the regular season. A number that was no doubt topped in the postseason, even as Lee had to work while wearing a cumbersome facemask.

So what’s the difference? What set them over the top? What made them the best defensive team this league had to offer in 2008-09? The Defensive Player of the Year helped, no doubt. But most of all — and I know this seems like a copout in lieu of actual analysis — the Magic worked their asses off.

No team came close, and I watched ‘em all, this year. Watched ‘em over and over again. This squad played so hard, so unrelentingly, and without hesitation. It wasn’t an act. The Magic just didn’t want your screen and roll to work, if you didn’t mind. They weren’t too keen on you beating them in transition. They didn’t like the fact that you attempted to procure an offensive rebound. They felt uneasy in regards to your stated hope of making close to half of your shots.

So, if that’s the case regarding the Magic, where does that leave the Lakers?

As champions.

As absolute, deserved, champions.

I know it took a while to put together. I know it looks at times if they wouldn’t make it out of their own bracket or, worse, didn’t deserve to. And that’s coming from people with dimmer expectations of what this team is capable of.

I don’t know if anyone expects as much out of this version of the Los Angeles Lakers as I do. I saw 70-win potential in them, heading into this season. Didn’t think it would happen, not with all those variables, but I know that offense and I’ve seen what that defense can do. I know stats and I know where these players were headed. If they got it right, and stayed healthy … 70 wins.

Problem is, they didn’t stay healthy. And some of the career arcs seemed to spin off course.

After completely shoring up Los Angeles’ awful point guard defense from two years ago in 2007-08, Derek Fisher(notes) fell off the face of the earth defensively, like an NFL running back that somehow went from 1300 to 500 yards in a year’s time.

Jordan Farmar(notes), out of nowhere, fell off. Andrew Bynum(notes) tore a significant ligament in his knee, and Kobe Bryant(notes) lost a little bit of patience. A lot of patience. Especially in the first three rounds of this year’s postseason.

But with all of that logged against them? 65 wins, in 82 tries. 81 in 105 attempts, overall. Third in offense, sixth in defense. Those are championship stats, and as much as I’m telling myself to remember this team at its best, I’ll probably remember this team for not being able to take that extra step. Coming close, but falling short due to injury, slumps, and an impatient tone in May.

And I should stop, because that’s being ridiculous. Could it have gone better? Could it have gone smarter?

Yes, and yes. And guess what? They’re not robots. And, from November until mid-June, they walked all over this league.

The playoffs, I’m sorry, but that was a tough, tough run. Laugh at the Utah Jazz all you want, but that team can play. And some of the best offensive stretches (small things, good four or five minute runs, but “stretches” nevertheless) I’ve ever seen in my life came from these Lakers against a Jazz team some picked to win the West before the season started.

The Rockets? Chortle if you must at the absence of Tracy McGrady(notes) and (eventually) Yao Ming(notes), but that was an impossibly-tough defensive team that had advantages in all the right slots (Aaron Brooks taking on Fisher’s defense, most profoundly), and were about as stern as second round warnings come.

The Denver Nuggets? Mock if you will, but that was a championship caliber team that had quite a few pundits wondering aloud about who, exactly, would win a Denver/Orlando Finals pairing. They weren’t wrong in that line of thinking, because the Nuggets were good enough to get there.

And the Lakers were good enough to top them all.

And they were great enough to down the Orlando Magic in five games.

Three may have been close. Two may have been won in overtime, but they beat a great, great team four out of five times in June. That is so, so impressive.

These are the things we have to remember. These are the things we need to appreciate, now. Not just for this week, as something to chew on before the Draft hits and free agency takes over.

But for all time. These Lakers were a powerhouse.

These Lakers are a powerhouse.

Understand what the Lakers did to Orlando, with their offense. Please.

Teams double-team offensive firebrands like Kobe Bryant all season long. But nobody seems to get away with doubling Kobe, not just because of Kobe’s brilliance, but because of Los Angeles’ offense. And when the Magic, the best defensive team in the NBA did it, Los Angeles seemed to have a 6-on-3 advantage due to that offense, with its unmatched spacing. Not just your typical 4-on-3. The Magic were helpless once that ball started moving.

115, 104, 121, 103 and 110 points per 100 possessions for the Lakers in the series. That’s against the NBA’s best defense, a defense that gave up only 101.9 points per 100 points on average during the regular season. If the Lakers are the unstoppable force, and the Magic were the unmovable object, well, the force wouldn’t stop. And the object got to moving.

That’s the stuff I have to remind myself of. The Laker defense, however, will be hard to forget. Splayed out in front of me from Games 1 through 5, is the biggest thing I’ll take from this series.

Now, Orlando isn’t exactly the 2005 Phoenix Suns. They can fill it up as they did during Game 3, but they were still 11th in offense during the regular season. So it’s not the greatest accomplishment if you shut them down.

But watching that Laker defense in person? Observing that all-out effort? The length? The timing? The game plan (Phil Jackson’s assistants are just the gold standard)? The results?

Seeing the way Trevor Ariza(notes) absolutely manhandled Hedo Turkoglu? It wasn’t just that he was playing him physically; he was beating him to the spot, every time down court. By the end of Game 4, Hedo wanted absolutely nothing to do with playing against this guy, any more. Ariza just swallowed him up.

Speaking of which, Pau Gasol(notes)?

You might be sick of me going on about it, but the way this man was able to move his feet, I swear, it was downright Rodman-ian at times. I don’t toss that out there lightly. He had help, especially from slap-happy Laker guards and Lamar Odom(notes) on the baseline, but Pau deserves so, so much credit that I regret to assume he’ll never get for his work in this series. Just swallowed Dwight Howard up.

Kobe’s help defense was excellent. After years of me banging on about how I don’t believe he’s earned those all-NBA Defensive Team selections (I still don’t, because for the good of the Lakers, he takes defensive possessions off. Lots of them), this was continued proof (proof that I didn’t need, mind you) that Bryant is amongst the game’s best defensively when he has the ability to be.

And after a year spent working with Tim Grover, Bryant had that needed stamina. I talked with Grover after Game 5, and he wasted no time telling me that he thought the media reaction to Kobe’s supposed weary-legged ways was “hogwash,” mainly because Grover and Bryant had developed a system of stamina-building and rest that even went down to ways of conserving energy while others shoot free throws.

“Every second counts,” he told me. And while we were talking about little breaks in the action meant to refuel and reinvigorate, he may as well have been talking about Bryant’s overall approach to the game he’s obsessed with.

Kobe’s mannerisms may annoy the piss out of you. He might come off as transparent, or cloying, or obvious in his approach. It shouldn’t matter. The guy works hard. He obsesses over the game more than anyone in this league. And there’s a reason why, even if he isn’t as dominant a force as Jordan and Bird and Magic were, he still seems to put together just as many highlights as they did.

Not because he’s a publicity hound, desperate to make the cable recaps. Far from it. It’s because he knows the game well enough to work in this Laker offense and make the phenomenal look, well, phenomenal. Because he’s developed all the moves.

This isn’t to say he still isn’t worth shouting at. He does things in and out of that offense that leave stomping my feet with frustration, and I could give a rip who wins or loses. I’m not going to tell you that he’s earned the right to freelance as much as he does in that offense, because nobody should freelance in that offense, that much. Michael Jordan certainly didn’t, even when he wanted us to believe that he did.

What I can tell you is that the man deserves our respect. This paragraph used to be several paragraphs. It included several reasons why he deserves our respect. It could have grown into dozens of reasons why. I’m not going to bore you with them. I’m just going to demand that you appreciate a guy like Kobe Bryant, while he’s around.

This was more of a team victory than the coverage surrounding it will suggest. Bryant has a team that suits his talents, and I’m not trying to be obscure or contrarian when I suggest that Gasol’s defense was certainly on par with Kobe’s offense in this series, and that Bryant’s defense was about even with Gasol’s offense, making them both MVP candidates.

But if anyone deserves to be pushed forward, singularly, when four or five others deserve the spotlight as well, it’s Kobe. Because of that unending obsession, the one we all want our favorite players on our favorite teams to have.

And if Kobe’s your favorite player, on your favorite team? Congratulations. Because I don’t think this team is done, yet.

Bryant may be in his 30s, but there is absolutely no reason why he can’t have the security and the willingness to fade into the background a bit, as was the case with the man who drafted him, Jerry West. You know he’s smart enough to pull it off.

The 1971-72 Lakers set a then-NBA record for wins in a season with 69, and though West and Wilt Chamberlain were that team’s most enduring superstars, Jerry was second on the team in scoring, and Chamberlain was fourth. There’s no reason Kobe can’t take a step back, work as a facilitator, and remain his team’s most dangerous offensive contributor even if he does rack up the points or (and this is important) the assists. That’s up to Kobe, ever mindful of his place in history, to be secure enough to assume that we’d understand.

It’s also up to us to understand. To see why scaring people on the weak side offensively can be just as potent as nailing a 17-footer in Courtney Lee’s face. Hell, if we were good enough to appreciate Jackie Robinson scaring the wits out of the pitcher as he moved up and down the third base line, why can’t we admire the same from basketball players?

That’s in the future, we hope. For now, I guess I have to come back, and throw another bon mot Los Angeles’ way as the season ends. It wouldn’t be the first time.

I remember wrapping up a season-ending BtB for the last game of the 1999-00 season, giddy with potential, looking forward to a possible Laker dynasty even after a wearying season such as the one we just worked through. “See you next year,” I wrote. It’s what I ended the post with.

Of course, the site I wrote for didn’t make it ‘til the next season. And the site I wrote for after that didn’t make it to the Finals the next year. And the site I wrote for after that wasn’t really interested in detailing the game action. And on it went, for years.

And last year? Boy, I had fun. And I loved those Boston Celtics. But you never got a chance that they were in it for much more than 2008, and possibly 2009. Turns out, the former was right.

These Lakers? They look set to dominate. And that, to me, is never a bad thing when the basketball is good. And with these Lakers, the basketball is so, so good.

I don’t care that this franchise always seems to be in the Finals. I don’t care that we’ve seen these faces before. I don’t care if we know, by Christmas, who’s going to win it all.

I care about great basketball. And outside of my family and friends and the readers that dare pull me up every morning, it’s always been what I care about the most.

The Los Angeles Lakers are giving us great basketball. Time and time again, on both sides. And whatever happens from here on out, whatever form they take, whatever fork they choose, I’ll always appreciate what they gave me, us, this season.

See you next year. I mean it, this time.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Boeing upbeat, Airbus wins order at Paris Air Show

A defiant Boeing said Monday the aviation industry’s troubles may be ending, while Airbus kicked off the race for plane orders at this year’s Paris Air Show, clouded by rainy skies, recession and the unexplained crash of Air France Flight 447.

With the global aviation industry facing unprecedented losses and falling revenue, no one attending the 100th anniversary of the world’s first and largest air show was expecting Airbus or Boeing to unveil the raft of new jet orders that have been a staple of the event over the past four years.

But some airlines were still willing to get out their checkbook, including Gulf-based carriers such as Qatar Airways and Gulf Air. Airbus scored its first order of the Paris Air Show from Qatar Airways, which wants 24 jets from the Airbus A320 family.

Qatar Airways’ head, Akbar al-Baker, announced a firm order for 24 of the planes, including 20 single-aisle A320s and firming-up of orders for four A321 jets announced last year at the Farnborough Air Show.

He said the deal announced Monday is worth $1.9 billion, which is about the same as the list price. Airlines, however, usually negotiate steep discounts to the list price, particularly during grim economic times.

Meanwhile, Rolls-Royce PLC signed a $1.5 billion order with Gulf Air to supply engines for the Bahrain-based airline’s new Airbus A330 long-haul aircraft. The British aircraft engine manufacturer will supply Trent 700EP engines to power 20 Airbus A330 aircraft, with deliveries beginning in 2012.

Canada’s Bombardier announced it had won, confirmed or converted a total of 35 firm orders for its CRJ1000 NextGen jets by Spanish regional carrier Air Nostrum, in deals worth a total of $1.75 billion.

Boeing set the tone for its air show last week, when its vice president for marketing of commercial aircraft Randy Tinseth warned not to expect a flurry of orders.

Still, Boeing Co. sought to strike a positive tone in face of the ambient gloom surrounding the show, saying key programs such as its 787 remain on track and that the industry’s long-term prospects are strong.

“Are we down in the dumps about the status of this industry? Have we allowed the current economic situation to overwhelm us and discourage us from the path ahead? The answer is absolutely no,” Scott Carson, president and chief executive of Boeing’s commercial aircraft division, said Monday.

“At this point it appears to us that the economic conditions have bottomed,” Carson said. “If they have bottomed and a recovery comes next year, I think we have a shot at getting through.”

Boeing recently cut its outlook for the commercial aircraft market for the first time in at least a decade, which Carson said was mainly driven by the drop in freight traffic due to the global recession.

Carson said long-term prospects for the industry “are as robust as they have ever been.”

However, in answer to some hopeful attendees who thought Boeing might spring a surprise first flight during the show, Carson had disappointing news.

“If you were expecting the 787 to fly during the air show you will be disappointed,” said Carson. “If it had happened during the air show it would have been great, but It was never our intention.”

“The airplane will fly when it is completely ready,” he said.

Already reeling from the global recession, the industry gathering near where Air France Flight 447 should have landed only two weeks ago has been shaken by the still-unexplained crash. Investigators have only two more weeks to find the flight data and cockpit voice recorders before the signals emitted by small beacons on the so-called black boxes start to fade. Without them, the cause of the May 31 accident may never be fully known.

“The aviation community is still under some shock with the severity of this accident,” Airbus CEO Tom Enders said.

France’s prime minister, Francois Fillon, formally opened the show, touring Airbus displays with French CEOs under a pelting rain. Industry executives from around the world sloshed their way through muddy lots to the Le Bourget airfield, and rain tangled transport to the crowded event, delaying many visitors.

The Paris Air Show is marking its 100th anniversary. It opened to industry on Monday, and then to the public Friday to Sunday. Organizers expect around 300,000 visitors this year, about the same as the last show in 2007. More than 2,000 exhibitors from 48 countries are taking part.

The traditional dogfight over orders between rival planemakers Boeing Co. and Airbus SA has been tempered as the world economic crisis forces airlines to cancel or delay plans to buy planes. Tight credit markets have made it more difficult for potential customers to secure financing.

The International Air Transport Association has warned that the world’s airlines will collectively lose $9 billion this year.

So far this year, Boeing — which is cutting 10,000 jobs — has taken orders for 73 planes, but with cancellations of 66, the net order intake is only 7 jets.

Airbus — which hasn’t announced extra job cuts but had already been cutting payroll in a restructuring program launched in 2007 — has booked fewer orders at 32, but with fewer cancellations has a better net balance of 11 jets.

Still both plane makers are cushioned by order backlogs of around 3,500 planes.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

World’s first face, hands transplant patient dies

A Frenchman who underwent the world’s first face and double-hand transplant in April after being horribly disfigured in an accident has died, hospital officials said Monday.

The 30-year-old man died of cardiac arrest while undergoing a follow-up operation on June 8, according to Laurent Lantieri, the surgeon who performed the ground-breaking transplant near Paris.

“He developed a facial infection a few weeks after his operation, and during an operation to try to tackle the infection he suffered cardiac arrest,” Lantieri told RTL radio.

Lantieri said the patient’s death was linked to a heart problem, not to the transplant itself.

“Developing an infection is a common phenomenon among transplant patients,” he said. “All the biopsies we performed showed there was absolutely no rejection. Neither was it a vascular problem.”

“We have no explanation for the cardiac arrest,” Lantieri said, adding that he was awaiting results of a post-mortem examination.

Surgeons had replaced the patient’s entire face above the lips, including the scalp, nose, ears and forehead, in a 30-hour operation involving a medical team of more than 40.

The recipient, on a donor waiting list for more than a year, had burn scars to the face and hands so severe that it had robbed him of all social life.

The French biomedical agency, which oversees transplants in the country, issued a statement saying the latest operation was inevitable considering the scale of the patient’s injuries.

“This transplant was the only way to reduce his functional and aesthetic handicap,” it said.

“Every measure had been taken to insure the patient was very clearly and fully informed about the surgery, about its inherent risks and the constraints,” the agency added.

It added that the results of the face or arm transplants carried out in France over the past decade were “encouraging,” with one death and one amputation among a total of nine recipients.

Worldwide, there have been five other face transplants to date, three of them in France, but it was the first time a transplant of both hands and the face had been completed in one go.

The first successful face transplant was performed in France in 2005 on Isabelle Dinoire, a 38-year-old woman who had been mauled by her dog.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

AP Poll: Downturn doesn’t keep wedding guests away

In Michigan, one of the states hit hardest by the recession, Wendy Higgins has reluctantly told a favorite niece she may not have enough money for her wedding present in August. Higgins’ disability checks have stopped, and her husband was laid off in December. The couple fears they could even lose their home.

But Higgins, who worked in the auto industry building engine prototypes, wouldn’t miss the wedding. “My niece said the most important thing is just for me to be there,” says Higgins, 53. “And she’s marrying the nicest boy. I’ll wait until things get better, and send a check when we can.”

An Associated Press-Brides.com poll released Monday shows that the rituals of attending weddings and giving the couple gifts, while not totally recession-proof, are still deeply important to family and friends, and somewhat resistant to the economic meltdown.

Only 3 percent of Americans said they’d declined an invitation to attend a wedding in the past two years for financial reasons. And 90 percent of those who’d attended a wedding recently said they’d bought a gift for the couple.

But that doesn’t mean couples should assume they’re getting one: The survey, conducted by GfK, showed that only 28 percent of Americans feel couples should expect a gift.

“I just think it’s rude to assume people will give you something,” says Higgins, of Marine City, Mich. “You just don’t know how much people have.” Liz Collins of Savannah, Ga. agrees. “A present is something people should give if they are so moved,” says Collins, 31, who works with her husband at a home for boys.

And yet most Americans feel obliged to give gifts nonetheless — including those who know they can’t really afford it.

Like Kellie Turpin, who was laid off from her job in car sales a year ago. The mother of three from North Brookfield, Mass., has not been to a wedding in several years. But if she did attend one, she’d give the same kind of gift she gave before losing her job: cash or gift card, in the $75 range, or perhaps her own handmade crafts.

“I shouldn’t give like I normally do, but I would,” says Turpin, 42. “Because otherwise I don’t think it’s fair to the bride and groom, to be honest with you. It’s their marriage.”

Turpin would also send a gift — maybe $50 in cash, or a gift certificate — even if she wasn’t attending the wedding. Many Americans would do the same: Fully 63 percent said they’d feel obliged to do so.

But as anyone who’s ever been to a wedding, had a wedding or even thought about a wedding knows, men and women do not necessarily think alike on such matters.

For example, though relatively few people said they’d be likely to attend the wedding and forego a gift entirely if they couldn’t afford it, men, especially younger men, were more likely to do so. Only 20 percent of women of any age said they were likely to do so, compared to 50 percent of men under 35, and 23 percent of men over 35. (Translation: young men are cheaper than women, young or old, when it comes to weddings.)

And more than four in 10 single men said they’d be likely to go with that option, compared to a quarter of single women.

Those men are missing the point, says etiquette expert Anna Post. “Weddings are a REALLY big deal, and we can forget that,” says Post, spokesman for the Emily Post Institute (she’s Emily’s great-great-granddaughter) and contributor to Brides.com. “There’s no minimum amount for a gift — it just has to be something, and it has to be meaningful. One spatula doesn’t do it.”

John Williams, a 21-year-old recent college grad from Santa Cruz, Calif., attends weddings about twice a year. He thinks someone who can’t afford a gift shouldn’t stay away for that reason.

“Some people might not be able to give, but they should feel good about coming anyway,” says Williams, who is single. “If I couldn’t give a gift, I’d still go, totally, to be there for my friends.”

But he might be just as likely to throw caution to the wind — younger people were more likely to say they’d buy a gift they couldn’t afford, though mostly younger women, not men. “I’d like to think I’d be cautious and thinking about my budget, but it’s possible I might not be,” Williams says.

Only a quarter of seniors said they’d be likely to buy something they couldn’t afford. One retiree in Bozeman, Mont., thinks the issue isn’t the amount of the gift, but the usefulness.

“Myself, I don’t like receiving presents that aren’t useful to me,” says Guy Betts, who is 84. “So I’d buy gifts that are practical, something they’ll use every day, like kitchenware maybe.”

The median price people paid for wedding gifts over the past two years was $80, though 10 percent said $300 or more. And the median total cost of attending the wedding — including gifts, travel, lodging and clothing — was $200 for those who traveled out of town, double for people who had to travel more than 100 miles. Six percent of those questioned spent $2,000 or more.

That’s why Chuck Rizzo, of Venice, Fla., doubts he could take such trips now, if they involved airline travel and a rental car: “These days, I’d probably just send an envelope — maybe even if it was immediate family.”

Rizzo is a former small business owner, but now is forced to cobble together part-time jobs in retail, and occasional handyman work. Times are very tough, but he just attended a wedding three weeks ago, and plans to attend another in a few weeks, both within driving distance.

“There’s not a part of a wedding that I don’t enjoy,” says Rizzo, 47, who is married and has a young daughter. “I find myself thinking back to my own wedding. I just find it a very sacred experience. Weddings are one of the few sacred things we have left in the world.”

The AP-Brides.com poll was conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media from May 28-June 1, 2009. It is based on landline and cellular telephone interviews with a random sample of 1,000 adults, including 939 adults who have ever attended a wedding. The margin of error for those who have ever attended a wedding is plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

STIMULUS WATCH: $25 check may cost you food stamps

When President Barack Obama increased unemployment benefits as part of his economic stimulus, he also made some Americans ineligible for hundreds of dollars a month in food stamps.

Under the economic recovery plan, laid-off workers have seen a $25 weekly bump in their unemployment checks as part of a broad expansion of benefits for the poor. But the law did not raise the income cap for food stamp eligibility, so the extra money has pushed some people over the limit.

Laid-off workers and state officials are only now realizing the quirk, a consequence of pushing a $787 billion, 400-page bill through Congress and into law in three weeks.

And for people hurt by the change, there’s no way around it.

“Everybody tells you, ‘Yeah, I can understand why you’re frustrated. It doesn’t sound right.’ But nobody knows where to go,” said Mark Milota, 47, of Marietta, Ga., who was laid off in November from his job at a medical billing company.

The Georgia Department of Human Resources explained in a letter to him last month that, because of the stimulus, he was ineligible for food stamps. He now makes $1,538 a month — $21 too much for a family of two to qualify.

“We have to pay him that $25 a week,” said Brenda Brown, assistant commissioner at the Georgia Department of Labor. “And he doesn’t have the option not to accept it.”

Milota said he was told that, without the stimulus money, he would have received about $300 a month in food stamps.

“I’m doing things I’ve never done before: I’m going to food pantries. I’ve gone to places for assistance on bills,” Milota said. “Some bills are just not being paid. I’m three months behind on my mortgage.”

Unemployment benefits vary by state and the income cap for food stamps also varies based on family size, so it’s impossible to say for certain how many people are hurt by the change. Government officials believe it is only a small fraction of the record 6.8 million people on unemployment. Many more people will benefit from a stimulus law that expanded unemployment and food stamp benefits.

“We’ve gotten some questions about this. Not tons and tons, but we have been getting questions about this,” said Jean Daniel, a spokeswoman for the Department of Agriculture, which overseas the food stamp program now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

When cases like Milota’s began popping up in Iowa recently, officials called Washington, asking what to do.

“We were told we were interpreting the food stamp regulations correctly,” said Roger Munns, spokesman for the Iowa Department of Human Services. “Once you’re over the income limit, regardless of the reason, you’re no longer eligible.”

Once handed out as paper vouchers, food stamps are now delivered to people near the poverty level through debit cards that they can use to buy food. A record 32.5 million people participate in the program. Once the government determines someone is eligible, officials use a formula to calculate the monthly benefit, which ranges from $16 to $588. The average is about $111.

Because those close to the income limit tend to get less money in food stamps, Munns said most people who are bumped out of the program by the extra $100 in unemployment benefits each month will break even or fare just slightly better. But the stimulus checks were intended to ease the effects of the recession, not simply cancel out another government assistance program.

Lawmakers crafting the stimulus knew this would become a problem, said Stacy Dean, director of food assistance policy at Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. They could have headed it off by raising the income tax or declaring that the $25 stimulus checks would not affect food stamp eligibility. Both were expensive options that could have forced states to reprogram their computer systems.

But more importantly, hashing out those details would have taken time.

“People were aware of this but, as you recall, the stimulus was moving along and then it was passed in about a day,” Dean said. “There was not a lot of policy discussion on this.”

Milota said he had never been on food stamps before and resisted applying for months, believing he would find a job. But that has proved difficult. When he applied for a customer service job recently, he said the company told him there were 1,000 applicants.

The stimulus law was intended not just as a jolt to the economy but also to ease the burden on people in Milota’s situation. Besides unemployment benefits, the law also increased food stamp benefits — just not the income cap.

“I truly believe when it came out, they felt it was to help people, and they never wanted to hurt people,” said Milota, who says he leans Republican but voted for Obama.

Officials in Washington say they’re aware of stories like this. Changing things, however, requires changing the law. States could do this one by one, or Congress could do so.

“This is not something the president or this agency could do independently,” Daniel, the Agriculture Department spokeswoman, said.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Air France switches to new plane speed sensors

Air France has replaced the air speed sensors on its entire fleet of Airbus A330 and A340 long-haul aircraft, a pilots’ union official said Monday. The company had been under pressure from pilots who feared the devices could be linked to the crash of Flight 447.

In the deep waters of the mid-Atlantic, a Dutch ship towing a high-tech, U.S. Navy listening device was to begin trolling Monday in search of the flight data and voice recorders that investigators say are key to determining what caused the Air France jet to crash into the ocean with 228 people on board.

Investigators looking into the May 31 crash of Air France Flight 447 have so far focused on the possibility that external speed monitors — called Pitot tubes — iced over and gave false readings to the plane’s computers.

In the weeks before the accident, Air France had begun replacing the tubes on its A330 and A340 jets, but not yet on the plane that crashed. After the accident, the airline pledged to speed up the switch and complete it by the end of this month, after pilots complained that the change was not proceeding quickly enough.

The whole fleet “is equipped since the end of last week with Thales’ BA sensors,” said Erick Derivry, a spokesman for the SNPL pilots’ union. The crashed jet was equipped with the older AA model sensors, which Airbus has recommended airlines replace.

Despite questions about the performance of the Pitot tubes on the disappeared jet, Derivry stressed, “Today it is not proven or established that the AA model probes are at the origin of the accident.”

Air France officials were not immediately available to confirm that the sensors had been replaced.

Concern about the crash clouded the Paris Air Show, where aviation industry officials, jetmakers and airline executives gathered Monday amid bleak prospects for the sector. Qatar Airways’ head, Akbar al-Baker, said his airline was in the process of replacing its Pitot tubes before the accident.

An official of the French accident investigation agency, BEA, arrived in the Brazilian city of Recife on Sunday to begin examining some of the debris retrieved from the ocean. It was unclear whether the BEA would continue analyzing the pieces in Brazil or have them shipped to France.

French Ambassador Pierre-Jean Vandoorne, who is liaising between the families of the victims and the authorities, said Monday he met in Recife with those in charge of the Brazilian search, said that the search teams are not scaling back.

“No date has yet been fixed regarding an eventual halt to the search at sea,” he said on France-2 television. He said Brazilian and French aviation have already spent 1,000 flight hours looking for victims and debris.

He would not comment on the nationality of the bodies found so far. Coroners have said victims’ dental records and DNA samples from relatives will be necessary to confirm the identities of the 16 bodies that have been examined so far.

Brazilian authorities say they have recovered 43 bodies and another six have been pulled from the Atlantic by French ships.

The U.S. Navy device, called a Towed Pinger Locator, will try to detect emergency audio beacons, or pings, from Flight 447’s black boxes, which could be lying thousands of feet (meters) below the ocean surface.

The initial search area spans a 2,000-square-mile (5,180-square-kilometer) area of the Atlantic, said U.S. Air Force Col. Willie Berges, commander of the American military forces supporting the search operation.

The ship was set to embark on a grid pattern search after receiving instructions from French military officials also using a nuclear submarine to search for the black boxes, Berges said. A second Dutch ship carrying another pinger locater was expected to arrive in the area Monday afternoon.

Without the recorders, it may be impossible to ever know what caused the Airbus A330 to crash several hundred miles off Brazil’s northeastern coast on May 31 en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.

Thus far, there is no evidence of an explosion or terrorist act, just clues that point to systemic failures on the plane. Experts say the evidence uncovered up until now points to at least a partial midair breakup of the plane.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Britain to examine Iraq war errors in inquiry

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown authorized a long-awaited inquiry into the Iraq war on Monday that aimed to examine mistakes made during and after the 2003 U.S-led invasion.

Lawmakers and anti-war protesters have repeatedly demanded that an independent panel scrutinize what they say are a range of errors made by Britain, the United States and other allies in prewar intelligence and postwar planning.

Brown’s spokesman Michael Ellam said the prime minister would tell Parliament later on Monday how the inquiry will be conducted, and would not comment on whether the inquiry would be held in public or private.

Britain’s remaining 4,000 troops ended their six-year operation in Iraq in April, a mission that cost the lives of 179 service personnel and was deeply unpopular with the public.

Troops expect to complete a withdrawal from the southern Iraqi city of Basra, where British personnel were mainly based, by the end of July.

Opponents of the Iraq war have urged Brown to allow the inquiry to investigate prewar discussions between former U.S. President George W. Bush and then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair in 2002.

“There needs to be a full public inquiry to find out exactly why we were taken to war and to investigate the discussions between Tony Blair and George Bush in 2002,” said Lindsey German, of Britain’s Stop The War Coalition.

Britain has previously held two inquiries into aspects of the decision to join the U.S.-led war.

One cleared the government of blame for the death of David Kelly, a government weapons scientist who killed himself in 2003 after he was exposed as the source of a British Broadcasting Corp. report that accused Blair’s office of “sexing up” prewar intelligence.

A separate 2004 inquiry into intelligence on Iraq also cleared Blair’s government, but criticized intelligence officials for relying on seriously flawed or unreliable sources.

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband has said previously the inquiry is likely to be held in private to preserve confidentiality for troops, citing as a possible model the behind-closed doors inquiry that followed the 1982 Falklands War.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Redemption: Bryant leads Lakers to 15th NBA title

Kobe Bryant(notes) jumped and punched the air. He did it again, seven years of pent up frustration freed in a fit of joy.

This was the one he wanted more than all the others.

The one to top them all.

One year after failing miserably in the finals against Boston, Bryant and the Los Angeles Lakers found redemption. They finished a season they felt was theirs with a 99-86 win over the Orlando Magic on Sunday night in Game 5 to win the 15th NBA title in franchise history.

For Bryant, this was the missing piece from his resume, his fourth championship and first without former teammate Shaquille O’Neal(notes).

“I don’t have to hear that criticism, that idiotic criticism anymore,” said Bryant, the finals MVP. “It was annoying.”
For Lakers coach Phil Jackson, this was title No. 10, moving him past legendary Celtics coach Red Auerbach for the most by a coach in league history.

“I’ll smoke a cigar in honor of Red,” Jackson said. “He was a great guy.”

For Pau Gasol(notes). For Derek Fisher(notes). For Lamar Odom(notes). For Trevor Ariza(notes) and for Andrew Bynum(notes) and the rest of the Lakers, this was a title to savor.

“It’s a dream come true,” Gasol said. “The completion of a goal.”

Odom scored 17 points, Ariza had 15, Gasol 14 and 15 rebounds, and Fisher, whose two big 3s in Game 4 saved L.A., had 13 points.

It took longer than Bryant expected, but he has stepped from O’Neal’s enormous shadow—at last.

Bryant averaged 32.4 points, 7.4 assists, 5.6 rebounds and more than a dozen cold-blooded glares per game. He wasn’t out to make friends in these finals, he was out for redemption. Throughout the playoffs, he didn’t smile. He just snarled and bared his teeth.

“I was just completely locked in,” he said. “I was grumpy for a while and now I’m just ecstatic, like a kid in a candy store.”

O’Neal, who won three titles with Bryant before the pair had a major falling out, was glad to see his former teammate win another.

“Congratulations kobe, u deserve it,” O’Neal said on his Twitter page. “You played great. Enjoy it my man enjoy it.”

Bryant and Jackson, whose relationship strained and briefly snapped under the weight of success, are again at the top of their games.

Together.

Following the game, the pair shared a long embrace.

Jackson, who once called Bryant “a selfish player” now sees the 30-year-old in a far different light.

“He’s learned how to become a leader in a way in which people want to follow him,” Jackson said. “That’s really important for him to have learned that because he knew that he had to give to get back in return, and so he’s become a giver rather than just a guy that’s a demanding leader. That’s been great for him and great to watch.”

After the final horn, Bryant and his teammates bounced around the floor of Amway Arena. Moments later, Bryant swept his two daughters, both wearing gold Lakers dresses, into his arms.

It was just as he dreamed.

“It finally felt like a big old monkey was off my back,” he said. “It felt so good to be able to have this moment. For this moment to be here and to reflect back on the season and everything that you’ve been through, it’s top of the list, man.”

Bryant had come up short twice in the finals before, in 2004 with O’Neal against Detroit, and again last season against the Celtics in the renewal of the league’s best rivalry. The Lakers were beaten in six games, losing the finale in Boston by 39 points, a humiliating beatdown that Bryant and his teammates had trouble shaking.

They went to training camp with one goal in mind. This was going to be their season, and except for a few minor missteps, it was.

In the locker room afterward, Bryant made sure Jackson got a champagne shower.

“He took his glasses off, threw his head back and soaked it all in because this is a special time,” Bryant said. “For us to be the team that got him that historic 10th championship is special for us.”

Orlando will be haunted by moments in a series that swung on a few plays and had two overtime games.

After losing Game 1 by 25 points, the Magic had their chance in Game 2 but rookie Courtney Lee(notes) missed an alley-oop layup in the final second of regulation. In Game 4, Dwight Howard(notes) clanged two free throws with 11.1 seconds, and the Magic allowed Derek Fisher to nail a game-tying 3-pointer to force OT.
Howard, the Magic’s superhero center, was hardly a factor in Game 5. He scored 11 points and took just nine shots. Rashard Lewis(notes) scored 18 points, but was only 3 of 12 on 3s for Orlando, which after living on the 3, finally died by it.

The Magic went just 8 of 27 from long range.

When the game ended, Howard didn’t move. As his teammates headed to the locker room, Howard stayed on Orlando’s bench and watched as the Lakers celebrated on the Magic’s floor. Jameer Nelson(notes), Orlando’s point guard who came back for the finals after missing four months with a shoulder injury, finally joined him

The two sat stunned.

“What I just told Jameer is look at it, just see how they’re celebrating,” Howard said. “It should motivate us to want to get in the gym, want to get better.”

Orlando was trying to become the first team to overcome a 3-1 deficit in the finals. They had rallied to knock off Philadelphia and Boston, and then upset LeBron James(notes) and Cleveland in the conference finals. The Magic always felt they had a shot at history.

Bryant, though, wouldn’t be denied his place.

“They had an answer,” Orlando coach Stan Van Gundy said, “for everything.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments